My heart is always cheered when I read research
investigating the mode of anti-cancer action of a natural substance so
was very interested in the research update by Shitaba et al
from Osaka Health Science University, Osaka Japan regarding the
antitumour growth and antimetastatic activities of alpha-mangostin, from
the mangosteen fruit, which has a long history of medicinal use in
Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine.
Alpha-mangostin, isolated from the pericarp of the fruit, was shown to induce cell death in various types of cancer cells in in vitro
studies. These researchers investigated the antitumour growth and
antimetastatic activities of alpha-mangostin in a mouse model of mouse
metastatic mammary cancer with a p53 mutation that induces a metastatic
spectrum similar to that seen in human breast cancers.
“Not only were in vivo survival rates
significantly higher in the alpha-mangostin group versus controls, but
both tumour volume and the multiplicity of lymph node metastases were
significantly suppressed. Apoptotic levels were significantly increased
in the mammary tumours of mice receiving alpha mangostin and were
associated with increased expression of active caspase-3 and -9. Other
significant effects noted at this dose level were decreased microvessel
density and lower numbers of dilated lymphatic vessels containing
intraluminal tumour cells in mammary carcinoma tissues. In vitro, alpha-mangostin induced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and G1-phase arrest and S-phase suppression in the cell cycle…
“Since lymph node involvement is the most important
prognostic factor in breast cancer patients, the antimetastatic activity
of alpha-mangostin as detected in mammary cancers carrying a p53
mutation in the present study may have specific clinical applications.
In addition, alpha-mangostin may have chemopreventive benefits and/or
prove useful as an adjuvant therapy, or as a complementary alternative
medicine in the treatment of breast cancer.”
www.positivehealth.com/research/shibata-and-colleagues
Additionally in this Positive Health PH Online April Issue 205, are two editorial features describing other non-drug treatment approaches for cancer: In Pregnancy Connection with Cancer, author Cal Crilly reminds us that the connection between cancer and pregnancy dates back to John Beard 1902:
“Beard noticed that when the pancreas began working in a
foetus around the 56th day, the pancreas began helping to breakdown hCG
or Human Chorionic Gonadotropin via enzymes, hence Beard used
pancreatic enzymes as a cancer cure… Putting aside biased opinions
against natural therapies controlling the trophoblastic actions of a
tumour should be basic knowledge in cancer treatment… The enzymes that
influence both trophoblast[9] and tumour functions are these days called
caspases[10] and a large majority of chemotherapy options will affect
the caspases[11] which in effect tell tumour cells to shut up shop or
undergo apoptosis which is cell shutdown.
“There is also a long list of non-toxic foods and teas
that affect caspases and they are commonly used in alternative treatment
of cancer, though the practitioners may not be aware of their caspase
properties. What is as interesting are the similarities between
embryonic implantation and tumour attachment; both involve angiogenesis
or new arterial growth and to do this cells of the uterine wall and its
collagen matrix have to be dismantled and removed.”
Crilly also discusses other relevant topics, including
treatment approaches that either feed or poison tumours, hypo or
hyper-methylation of DNA, retroviruses, the immune system, and
anti-cancer compounds including Green tea, Turmeric and Oleuropein and
Bromelain.”
www.positivehealth.com/article/cancer/the-pregnancy-cancer-connection
In the article Ayurveda in Action in South India, author Prasanna Probyn details the treatment of the Arogya Clinic in Tamil Nadu, South India.
“…when it comes to chronic diseases, like cancer, Ayurveda looks to stronger substances to treat them.
“Samanam is good in acute conditions where you have to
bring it under control. Allopathy also comes under this category but it
is not the best solution. Many problems can be treated just through
changes in lifestyle and diet . When it gets beyond a certain level then
we have to use more powerful means of treatment.
“We use poison to deal with severe forms of diseases with levels of intervention proportionate to the problem.
“If safer options are offered by Allopathy, then Arogya
uses these. “The two systems can be integrated at the right time and
place.
“Cancers are a result of intrinsic irritation or
imbalances where the immune system is depressed for various reasons such
as toxicity and chronic mental and physical stress leading to the over
production of hormones. In a continuously stressed immune system, toxins
modify the DNA to create monster cells. A robust immune system reduces
the risk of cancer, says Dr Varier.”
www.positivehealth.com/article/ayurveda/ayurveda-in-action-in-south-india
Therefore, reading clinical and research findings such
as those detailed above, might make one optimistic regarding the state
of conventional cancer treatments. However, such is not the case;
despite the rapid advances in molecular biology, biochemistry and
immunochemistry, the tools used by oncologists still remain as they have
been for most of the last 50-60 years - surgery, chemotherapy and
radiotherapy. As studies with these ‘conventional’ treatment approaches
are the only ones with enough ‘evidence’ to inform oncologists, advances
in the understanding of how cancers act, and substances which have
effective anti-tumour activities largely remain outside the knowledge of
conventional oncologists.
In addition to this sorry omission from what ought to be
the knowledge base of cancer specialists, remains the still active 1939
Cancer Law which outlaws the treatment of cancer using any treatments
other than surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Stalemate, Checkmate.
Outlined in a Letter to the Editor in Issue 198:
The Stranglehold that the UK 1939 Cancer Act Exerts in Great Britain
by Madeline C Hickey-Smith
“Most citizens of Great Britain are totally unaware of
the 1939 Cancer Act which effectively prevents them from finding out
about different treatments for cancer.
“Excerpts from the UK 1939 Cancer Act:
“4 - (1) No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement:
“(a) containing an offer to treat any person for
cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in
connection with the treatment thereof; or
“(b) referring to any article, or articles of any
description, in terms which are calculated to lead to the use of that
article, or articles of that description, in the treatment of cancer.
“In this section the expression "advertisement" includes
any "notice, circular, label, wrapper or other document, and any
announcement made orally or by any means of producing or transmitting
sounds".[1]
“Publication of such advertisements is permitted to a
very restrictive group comprising members of either House of Parliament,
local authority, governing bodies of voluntary hospitals, registered or
training to become registered medical practitioners, nurses or
pharmacists, and persons involved in the sale or supply of surgical
appliances. A very tight grip, therefore, is exercised on information
that is fed to citizens of Great Britain; interestingly, the Act does
not apply to Northern Ireland.
“That pretty much wraps it up, and wraps us (in Britain)
up in the legal stranglehold that this outdated Act still exerts. Was
this enacted to protect the citizens from charlatans and "quacks" or to
safeguard the interests of the National Radium Trust, to whom the
British Government lent money? If no one is allowed to tell us, how can
we, the general public, ever find out what alternatives there are to
those offered by mainstream medicine, mainly surgery, chemotherapy and
radiotherapy?”
“… It is our opinion that a reform of the 1939 Cancer
Act is long overdue. The tenacious grip that it holds on treating cancer
must be relinquished, so that patients and their healthcare providers
can make an informed choice as to what approach may be best for their
individual needs.”
www.positivehealth.com/article/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-issue-198
As a scientist and researcher who is approached by
cancer patients for information regarding potential treatment approaches
to their particular type of cancer, I can’t endorse enough the
sentiment stated in that letter; I continue to wholeheartedly work
toward the time when encouraging cancer research results are
communicated to and embraced by the oncology professions.